Mj. Field et al., GABAPENTIN (NEURONTIN) AND S-(-3-ISOBUTYLGABA REPRESENT A NOVEL CLASSOF SELECTIVE ANTIHYPERALGESIC AGENTS()), British Journal of Pharmacology, 121(8), 1997, pp. 1513-1522
1 Gabapentin (neurontin) is a novel antiepileptic agent that binds to
the alpha(2) delta subunit of voltage-dependent calcium channels. The
only other compound known to possess affinity for this recognition sit
e is the (S)-(+)-enantiomer of 3-isobutylgaba. However, the correspond
ing (R)-(-)-enantiomer is 10 fold weaker. The present study evaluates
the activity of gabapentin and the two enantiomers of 3-isobutylgaba i
n formalin and carrageenan-induced inflammatory pain models. 2 In the
rat formalin test, S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba (1-100 mg kg(-1)) and gabapent
in (10-300 mg kg(-1)) dose-dependently inhibited the late phase of the
nociceptive response with respective minimum effective doses (MED) of
10 and 30 mg kg(-1), s.c. This antihyperalgesic action of gabapentin
was insensitive to naloxone (0.1-10.0 mg kg(-1) s.c.). In contrast, th
e R-(-)-enantiomer of 3-isobutylgaba (1-100 mg kg(-1)) produced a mode
st inhibition of the late phase at the highest dose of 100 mg kg(-1) H
owever, none of the compounds showed any effect during the early phase
of the response. 3 The s.c. administration of either S-(+)-3-isobutyl
gaba (1-30 mg kg(-1)) or gabapentin (10-100 mg kg(-1)), after the deve
lopment of peak carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia, dose-depende
ntly antagonized the maintenance of this response with MED of 3 and 30
mg kg(-1), respectively. Similar administration of the two compounds
also blocked maintenance of carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesi
a with MED of 3 and 10 mg kg(-1), respectively. In contrast, R-(-)-3-i
sobutylgaba failed to show any effect in the two hyperalgesia models.
4 The intrathecal administration of gabapentin dose-dependently (1-100
mu g/animal) blocked carrageenan-induced mechanical hyperalgesia. In
contrast, administration of similar doses of gabapentin into the infla
med paw was ineffective at blocking this response. 5 Unlike morphine,
the repeated administration of gabapentin (100 mg kg(-1) at start and
culminating to 400 mg kg(-1)) over 6 days did not lead to the inductio
n of tolerance to its antihyperalgesic action in the formalin test. Fu
rthermore, the morphine tolerance did not cross generalize to gabapent
in. The s.c. administration of gabapentin (10-300 mg kg(-1)), R-(-) (3
-100 mg kg(-1)) or S-(+)-3-isobutylgaba (3 100 mg kg(-1)) failed to in
hibit gastrointestinal motility, as measured by the charcoal meal test
in the rat. Moreover, the three compounds (1-100 mg kg(-1), s.c.) did
not generalize to the morphine discriminative stimulus. Gabapentin (3
0-300 mg kg(-1)) and S-(+)-isobutylgaba (1-100 mg kg(-1)) showed sedat
ive/ataxic properties only at the highest dose tested in the rota-rod
apparatus. 6 Gabapentin (30-300 mg kg(-1), s.c.) failed to show an ant
inociceptive action in transient pain models. It is concluded that gab
apentin represents a novel class of antihyperalgesic agents.