Citation
D. Cook et al., CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER REPLACEMENT STRATEGIES - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE, Critical care medicine, 25(8), 1997, pp. 1417-1424
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of guidewire exchange and new site r
eplacement strategies on the frequency of catheter colonization and in
fection, catheter-related bacteremia, and mechanical complications in
critically ill patients.Data Sources: We searched for published and un
published research by means of MEDLINE and Science Citation Index, man
ual searching of Index Medicus, citation review of relevant primary an
d review articles, review of personal files, and contact with primary
investigators. Study Selection: From a pool of 151 randomized, control
led trials on central venous catheter management, we identified 12 rel
evant randomized trials of catheter replacement over a guidewire or at
a new site. Data Extraction: In duplicate and independently, we abstr
acted data on the population, intervention, outcome, and methodologic
quality. Data Synthesis: As compared with new-site replacement, guidew
ire exchange is associated with a trend toward a higher rate of cathet
er colonization (relative risk 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1
.84), regardless of whether patients had a suspected infection, Guidew
ire exchange is also associated with trends toward a higher rate of ca
theter exit-site infection (relative risk 1.52, 95% confidence interva
l 0.34 to 6.73) and catheter-related bacteremia (relative risk 1.72, 9
5% confidence interval 0.89 to 3.33), However, guidewire exchange is a
ssociated with fewer mechanical complications (relative risk 0.48, 95%
confidence interval 0.12 to 1.91) relative to new-site replacement. E
xchanging catheters over guidewires or at new sites every 3 days is no
t beneficial in reducing infections, compared with catheter replacemen
t on an as-needed basis. Conclusions: Guidewire exchange of central ve
nous catheters may be associated with a greater risk of catheter-relat
ed infection but fewer mechanical complications than new-site replacem
ent, More studies on scheduled vs, as needed replacement strategies us
ing both techniques are warranted, if guidewire exchange is used, meti
culous aseptic technique is necessary.