Carcinogen risk assessment is the process by which an attempt is made
to estimate human risk due to carcinogens, from the results of animal
studies. It is based upon a number of prudent default assumptions, tha
t is, assumptions that cannot be proved scientifically because either
the basic concept is philosophical in nature or because the amount of
scientific evidence required is too costly to obtain even on a world-w
ide basis. Recently, scientific effort has shown that more and more ex
amples have been described suggesting these examples do not behave in
the way indicated by the default assumptions. Since carcinogen risk as
sessment processes were initiated, it has been demonstrated that cance
r may arise by four or more different mechanisms. It is the purpose of
this paper to enquire whether consideration of these basically differ
ent mechanisms may facilitate carcinogen risk assessment. (C) 1997 Els
evier Science Ireland Ltd.