COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY - CAN THE SYSTEM SENSITIVITYVALUE BE USED AS AN IMAGE QUALITY INDICATOR

Citation
K. Andoh et al., COMPUTED RADIOGRAPHY EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY - CAN THE SYSTEM SENSITIVITYVALUE BE USED AS AN IMAGE QUALITY INDICATOR, Journal of digital imaging, 10(3), 1997, pp. 132-136
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
08971889
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
132 - 136
Database
ISI
SICI code
0897-1889(1997)10:3<132:CREU-C>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the computed radiogr aphy system sensitivity value can be used as an image quality indicato r for computed radiography excretory urography with radiation dose red uction. One hundred and twenty-four patients with gynecological malign ancies were studied prospectively. Five-minute and 10-minute computed radiographic images of excretory urography were obtained in each patie nt with different radiation doses tie, a standard dose image required with screen-fills method and a reduced dose one), The images were subj ectively scored by three radiologists without knowledge of the exposur e factors or the system sensitivity values, The quality scores of the reduced-dose images used in the five steps were compared with those of the standard dose images (the system sensitivity Value was 80 to 120) , The images with reduced exposures were arbitrarily divided into five steps according Po the system sensitivity value (ie, 150 to 250, 260- 400, 410-600, 610-1000, and 1010-1500), There was a gradual degradatio n oi;he image quality as the system sensitivity value was increased. I n terms of visualization of the bones, the images taken with the syste m sensitivity values of 150-250 (40%-67% of the standard dose system) showed no statistically significant difference from the standard dose images. As for visualization of the renal pelvic margins, the images t aken with the system sensitivity values of 260 to 400 (25%-38% of the standard dose system) showed no statistically significant difference, We conclude that system sensitivity value can be used as a practical t hough approximate indicator of the image quality. Copyright (C) 1997 b y W.B. Saunders Company.