THE PARTITION OF NUTRIENTS IN EWES MAINTAINED IN A MODERATE COMPARED WITH A LEAN BODY CONDITION IN LATE PREGNANCY

Citation
Dm. Mcneill et al., THE PARTITION OF NUTRIENTS IN EWES MAINTAINED IN A MODERATE COMPARED WITH A LEAN BODY CONDITION IN LATE PREGNANCY, Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(6), 1997, pp. 743-752
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
ISSN journal
00049409
Volume
48
Issue
6
Year of publication
1997
Pages
743 - 752
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-9409(1997)48:6<743:TPONIE>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The effect of ewe fatness on fetal weight at term was tested without t he confounding effects of placental weight and feed intake. We hypothe sised that fetal weights should be similar in fat or lean ewes with pl acentas of a similar size, and tested the hypothesis by manipulating n utrition so that, at mating, Merino ewes carrying a single fetus were in a medium (score 2.9, liveweight 46.6 kg) or lean (score 2.0, livewe ight 40.6 kg) condition. They were maintained at this fatness differen ce until slaughter at Day 146 of pregnancy when fetal, placental, and maternal tissues were weighed and analysed for composition. Subgroups (n = 8 per fatness group) slaughtered at Day 110, a stage when most pl acental hypertrophy is complete but the majority of fetal hypertrophy is yet to occur, confirmed that the treatments differed in ewe fatness (3.82 v. 9.19 kg empty-body fat, s.e.m. = 0.960, P < 0.001) but not p lacental weight (487 v. 538 g, s.e.m = 41.5, P > 0.05). By Day 146, fa tness differences (4.77 v. 9.56 kg empty-body fat, s.e.m. = 0.960, P < 0.001) and placental similarities (434 v. 502 g, s.e.m. = 38.3, P > 0 .05) were maintained, and both groups produced fetuses of similar size (4408 v. 4382 g, s.e.m. = 204.6, P > 0.05). However, the fetuses in t he lean ewes had 20% less fat/kg fat-free body weight (24 v. 30 g/kg, s.e.m. = 1.3, P < 0.01). Fetal weight was correlated with placental we ight (r = 0.70, P < 0.01) but not with ewe fatness. Fetal fatness, how ever, was correlated with ewe fatness (r = 0.69, P < 0.01). Ewe fatnes s per se did not influence fetal size but did influence the deposition of fat in the fetus, possibly via a greater ability of fatter ewes to partition more glucose toward their fetus.