K. Nibu et al., MULTIDIRECTIONAL STABILIZING POTENTIAL OF BAK INTERBODY SPINAL-FUSIONSYSTEM FOR ANTERIOR SURGERY, Journal of spinal disorders, 10(4), 1997, pp. 357-362
Improvement in laparoscopic surgery requires spinal-fusion devices app
ropriately designed for this technique. The BAK interbody fusion devic
e (Spine Tech Inc., Minneapolis, MN, U.S.A.), which consists of two ti
tanium screw cages, meets this requirement. Multidirectional stabilizi
ng potential of this device was investigated by using an in vitro huma
n cadaveric model. Four fresh-frozen human lumbosacral spine specimens
(L5-S1) were used. The flexibility test consisted of applying six pur
e moments (flexion, extension, bilateral axial torques, and lateral be
nding moments) and measuring the ensuing three-dimensional motion. Mom
ents were applied in four load steps: 0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 Nm, a
nd for three load and unload cycles. Motion of the top vertebra was re
corded during the third load cycle by using a three-dimensional optoel
ectronic motion-measurement system. The motion parameters studied were
the ranges of motion (ROM) and the neutral zone (NZ). Comparing the R
OM of the intact specimen and after the fixation, all motions except e
xtension were reduced significantly (p < 0.005). Average percentage de
crease in ROM were 45.8% in flexion, 40.4% in axial rotation, and 65.6
% in lateral bending. The only significant changes in NZ were a 255.7%
increase in extension, a 90.9% increase in axial rotation, and a 70.8
% decrease in lateral bending. This biomechanical study revealed that
the BAK system provided decreases in ROM in all directions except in e
xtension. The increased NZ in extension and axial rotation is most lik
ely related to the positioning of the implant. Because these implants
were placed from the anterior, damage to anterior annulus and anterior
longitudinal ligament is inevitable. For clinical relevance, the pati
ents undergoing this surgical procedure should avoid extension motions
.