Pfm. Stalmeier et al., PREFERENCE REVERSALS - VIOLATIONS OF UNIDIMENSIONAL PROCEDURE INVARIANCE, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 23(4), 1997, pp. 1196-1205
Preference reversals have usually been explained by weighted additive
models, in which different tasks give rise to different importance wei
ghts for the stimulus attributes, resulting in contradictory trade-off
s. This article presents a preference reversal of a more extreme natur
e. Let (10, 5 Migr) denote living 10 years with a migraine for 5 days
per week. Many participants preferred (10, 5 Migr) to (20, 5 Migr). Ho
wever, when asked to equate these two options with a shorter period of
good health, they usually demanded more healthy life years for (20, 5
Migr) than for (10, 5 Migr). This preference reversal within a single
dimension cannot be explained by different importance weights and sug
gests irrationalities at a more fundamental level. Most participants d
id not change their responses after being confronted with their incons
istencies.