C. Wang et al., COMPARISON OF 2-THIOBARBITURIC ACID REACTIVE SUBSTANCES DETERMINATIONMETHODS IN VARIOUS TYPES OF FROZEN, FRESH MEAT, Journal of food lipids, 4(2), 1997, pp. 87-96
Triplicate batches of chicken breast (CB), chicken thigh (CT), fresh g
round beef (GB), ground beef patties frozen 2 years (BP), veal (V), po
rk roast (PR), ground pork frozen 1 year (GP) and lamb (L) were homoge
nized and subjected to each of five 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive sub
stances determination methods (n = 3 TBARS determinations/sample/metho
d/replicate). Distillation methods resulted in higher (p<0.05) TBARS v
alues than extraction methods for all types of samples. TBARS ranges w
ere CB=0.21-0.55; CT=0.21-0.40; GB=0.26-0.89; BP=1.14-4.00; V=0.18-0.8
2; PR=0.67-2.09; GP=1.17-4.01; and L=0.58-2.18. Distillation methods i
n which antioxidant was added did not consistently produce lower TBARS
than distillation without antioxidant. Distillation methods produced
TBARS approximately 2 times those produced by extraction methods in le
ss oxidized samples (CB, CT, GB, V), distillation methods produced TBA
RS 2.75 times those produced by extraction methods in move oxidized sa
mples (BP, PR, GP). Recoveries were quite different (ranging from abou
t 65% to 95%) for the various methods indicating the need to run both
standard curves and recovery rather than using published conversion fa
ctors in TBARS calculations.