Purpose. To evaluate two smoking-cessation practice exercises, one usi
ng standardized patients (SPs), the other using role playing by medica
l students. Method. In the spring of 1994 all 120 first-year Universit
y of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine students were given
lectures on the health effects of smoking and how physicians can help
patients quit. Afterward some of the students were randomly assigned
to two groups in which to practice counseling patients: Group 1 (n = 3
5) used SPs, Group 2 (n = 37) used role playing. Each of the Group 1 s
tudents practiced smoking-cessation techniques with an SP; the SP eval
uated the student on cognitive and communication skills, assigned an o
verall rating, and provided feedback using a standardized form. The Gr
oup 2 students (as well as the 48 students not assigned to a group) ro
le-played in pairs and used the same form to provide feedback. All the
students evaluated their respective practice exercises. Two weeks lat
er 24 Group 1 and 31 Group 2 students participated in a clinical-skill
s-assessment exercise using SPs. As in the Group 1 practice exercise,
each student was evaluated by an SP on cognitive and communication ski
lls and assigned an overall rating. Data were analyzed through a numbe
r of statistical methods. The cost of the SP program was determined. R
esults. The Group 1 students rated their practice exercise much more f
avorably than did the Group 2 students. However, there was no signific
ant difference between the groups in their ratings by the SPs on the c
linical-skills-assessment exercise. The use of SPs cost a great deal m
ore than did the use of role playing. Conclusion. Although the student
s rated the SPs higher than they did the role playing, the two tools p
roduced similar levels of skills attainment. The data suggest that hav
ing students practice smoking-cessation techniques through role playin
g may be as effective as using the more expensive SPs.