In their review of the recent ''explosion of spatially explicit theory
'' in ecology Kareiva and Wennergren (1995) suggest a number of emergi
ng principles for species conservation. One of these principles is tha
t how habitats are arranged in space can mitigate the risks of species
extinctions from habitat loss. I tested this by estimating the relati
ve importance of habitat loss and habitat spatial pattern (fragmentati
on) on population extinction, using a simple, spatially explicit simul
ation model. Results indicate that the effects of habitat loss far out
weigh the effects of habitat fragmentation. I therefore suggest that,
in fact, details of how habitats are arranged cannot usually mitigate
the risks of habitat loss. Conservation efforts should be aimed foremo
st at stopping habitat loss and at habitat restoration.