Kj. Gutzwiller et Ha. Marcum, BIRD REACTIONS TO OBSERVER CLOTHING COLOR - IMPLICATIONS FOR DISTANCE-SAMPLING TECHNIQUES, The Journal of wildlife management, 61(3), 1997, pp. 935-947
The species-confidence hypothesis asserts that birds prefer mates whos
e colors match those of their species and avoid potential mates whose
colors are atypical of conspecifics. Earlier point-count research indi
cated this mate-choice hypothesis also may explain avian reactions to
observer clothing color. In central Texas, during January and February
1993, we tested further whether the species-confidence hypothesis hol
ds for reactions to observer clothing color by determining how close a
n investigator could get to individuals before they flushed (approach
distance) and how long individuals remained visible near their initial
flush point (detectability period). The same investigator experimenta
lly wore or did not wear a hunter-orange vest, which some wildlife bio
logists wear as a safety precaution during hunting-season field studie
s. The vest did not affect approach distance for species with red or o
range on their bodies (American robin [Turdus,migratorius], P = 0.247;
northern cardinal [Cardinalis cardinalis], P = 0.196; ruby-crowned ki
nglet [Regulus calendula], P = 0.434; red-bellied woodpecker [Melanerp
es carolinus], P = 0.113). In contrast, approach distances for species
without red or orange were longer when the vest was worn than when it
was not worn (Carolina chickadee [Parus carolinensis], P = 0.032; nor
thern mockingbird [Mimus polyglottos], P = 0.033; yellow-rumped warble
r [Dendroica coronata], P = 0.001). Differences in detectability perio
d between vest conditions depended on air temperature for American rob
ins (P = 0.003) and on the variation in visibility within habitats for
northern cardinals (P < 0.001). Detectability period was shorter when
the vest was worn than when it was not worn for Carolina chickadees (
P = 0.057) and yellow-rumped warblers (P = 0.060). Thus, for several s
pecies this mate-choice hypothesis seems to apply to garment color as
well. Some species' reactions demonstrated that, if birds respond sign
ificantly to clothing color, important assumptions of distance-samplin
g techniques used to estimate avian richness, density, and abundance w
ill be violated, and these parameters will be underestimated. Wildlife
scientists will be more likely to draw valid inferences and recommend
effective management practices from avian data gathered via distance-
sampling methods if reactions to clothing color are precluded.