Screening is proposed to allow an early intervention concerning a dise
ased individual, but its public health consequences are seldom conside
red. We propose criteria to judge whether a screening program can be a
ssociated to a benefit to patients or society. These criteria refer to
the magnitude of disease, the characteristics of the pre-clinical sta
ge, the availability of reliable and valid tests, the effectiveness an
d risk for all individuals, whether they are diseased or not, and acce
ptability to the health-care system and to individuals. We illustrate
the application of these criteria to screening of human immunodeficien
cy virus among blood donors, hepatitis among recipients of labile bloo
d products, and bacterial contaminations among febrile recipients. The
se criteria should be considered in decision analyses including altern
atives to screening and all aspects of safety regarding patients and p
opulation.