Ca. Pissiotis et al., FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SURGICAL GOWNS IN THE OPERATING-THEATER, The European journal of surgery, 163(8), 1997, pp. 597-604
Objective: To compare the barrier function, comfort, and protection af
forded by nine types of surgical gowns during use and to identify fact
ors that may influence their effectiveness. Design: Prospective random
ised study. Setting: Teaching hospital, Greece. Material: 4 Types of d
isposable single layer gowns, 1 reusable cloth gown, and 4 types of di
sposable reinforced gowns used during 250 major operations by the surg
eon and first assistant (total n = 500). Interventions: Direct observa
tion by specially trained nurse and questionnaire to surgeons. Main ou
tcome measures: Contamination of the outside of the gown, blood strike
through, safety, and comfort. Results: Half of all gowns became conta
minated on the outside. The mean total rate of strike through was 90%
in reusable gowns (528/586 areas contaminated), 11% in disposable sing
le layer gowns (95/855 areas contaminated), and 3% in disposable reinf
orced. gowns (42/1407 areas contaminated). There were differences in s
trike through among the disposable gowns depending on the material and
design, the reinforced gowns consistently showing less strike through
than the single layer ones. The areas most vulnerable to strike throu
gh were the cuff, forearm, thigh, chest, and abdomen. From 80% to 99%
of surgeons felt comfortable and protected wearing disposable gowns, b
ut only 0 to 4% of surgeons felt comfortable and safe with reusable go
wns. Conclusions: Reusable cloth gowns have a high strike through rate
and were rejected by most surgeons. Reinforced disposable gowns provi
ded better protection. The highest strike through was at the cuffs, fo
rearms, and thighs, and this requires new designs for surgical gowns.