Ll. Judd et al., THE ROLE AND CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF SUBSYNDROMAL DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS (SSD) IN UNIPOLAR MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, Journal of affective disorders, 45(1-2), 1997, pp. 5-17
Analyses conducted in 10 526 community respondents investigated by the
NIMH Epidemiological Catchment Area (EGA) Program, revealed the 1-mon
th point prevalence of depressive symptoms and disorders in the genera
l population, at the first ECA interview (Wave 1) to be 10%, as follow
s: 2.3% major depressive disorder (MDD); 2.3% dysthymic disorder (DD);
1.5% minor depressive disorder (MinD); and 3.9% subsyndromal depressi
ve symptoms (SSD, defined as two or more depressive symptoms beneath t
he diagnostic threshold of MinD, DD or MDD). There appears to be two c
lasses of SSD in this community sample: first, SSD, which occurred as
an integral component of the course of unipolar major depressive disor
der (MDD); and, second, SSD occurring spontaneously in non-unipolar de
pressed community subjects. In the first instance, SSD was frequently
prodromal to episodes of MinD or MDD or residual to resolving episodes
. Analyses also support the conclusion that SSD is a clinically signif
icant, interepisode, depressive subtype of unipolar MDD, since SSD is
associated with harmful dysfunction in five of six measures of adverse
outcome, has a significantly increased prevalence of past histories o
f major depressive episodes, and an elevated lifetime prevalence of su
icide attempts. Comparison of subsyndromal depressive symptomatology o
r depressive disorder diagnoses at Wave 1 with diagnoses obtained, 1 y
ear later, at the Wave 2 interview, confirm the persistent and chronic
nature of depression in this large representative sample of community
respondents, in which 71% of subjects with depressive symptoms or dis
orders at Wave 1 continued to be symptomatic at Wave 2. In addition, s
ubjects experienced a surprising degree of change in depressive sympto
m and disorder diagnoses during the I-year observational window betwee
n Wave 1 and Wave 2, in which a remarkable percentage of individuals,
who began the year in a depressive symptom or disorder diagnostic cate
gory, ended the year in another. This has led us to hypothesize that t
he typical clinical picture of unipolar MDD is dynamic and pleomorphic
in nature, characterized by substantial symptomatic fluidity, in whic
h patients frequently change diagnoses from one depressive subtype to
another during their course of illness. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V.