In the past few years, the area of politics and culture has moved from
the margins of cultural inquiry to its center as evidenced by the num
ber of persons who identify themselves as working within the area and
by its growing institutionalization within sociology. ''Politics and c
ulture'' suggests that each term constitutes an autonomous social real
m; whereas ''political culture'' suggests the boundaries of cultural a
ction within which ordinary politics occurs. Bourdieu's emphasis on bo
undary making, Foucault's disciplinary mechanisms, and Habermas's conc
eption of the public are setting the research agenda of scholars who f
ocus on macro-level social change. Interdisciplinary dialogues are eme
rging, conducted on a landscape of historical and contemporary empiric
al research. Four sub-areas have crystallized: first, political cultur
e, which focuses on problems of democratization and civil society; sec
ond, institutions, which includes law, religion, the state, and citize
nship; third, political communication and meaning; and fourth, cultura
l approaches to collective action. Promising directions for future wor
k are historical ethnographies, participant observation and interview
studies of political communication, and studies of political mobilizat
ion that examine how emotion operates in politics. Paradigms are not y
et firm within this area, suggesting that politics and culture is a di
sciplinary site of theoretical, methodological, and empirical innovati
on.