GAMMA-GLUTAMYL-TRANSPEPTIDASE IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST-TISSUE

Citation
Jr. Durham et al., GAMMA-GLUTAMYL-TRANSPEPTIDASE IMMUNOREACTIVITY IN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST-TISSUE, Breast cancer research and treatment, 45(1), 1997, pp. 55-62
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
ISSN journal
01676806
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
55 - 62
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-6806(1997)45:1<55:GIIBAM>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
GGT 129, a polyclonal antibody directed against gamma-glutamyl transpe ptidase (GGT), was used to study GGT expression in formalin-fixed para ffin-embedded tissues from normal breast, 24 benign lesions, 27 in sit u carcinomas or atypical hyperplasias, and 79 infiltrating mammary car cinomas. Epithelium of the ducts and ductules in normal breast tissue showed immunoreactivity along the apical surface. There was a strong c orrelation (P < 0.01) between the histologic classification of the tis sue and GGT expression. All of the benign breast lesions stained posit ive for GGT. Among in situ carcinomas and atypical hyperplasias, 5/27 (19%) were negative for GGT while 22/27 were immunopositive. Infiltrat ing carcinomas showed the greatest deviation from normal tissue with 2 3/79 (29%) negative for GGT. GGT expression in benign and malignant br east tissue was not correlated with the age of the patient, suggesting that menopausal status does not influence expression of GGT. Correlat ion of GGT immunoreactivity with tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphis m, mitoses, grade, size of tumor, lymph node status, and ER/PR status was performed for 69 cases of infiltrating ductal adenocarcinoma. Ther e were no statistically significant relationships between the level of GGT immunoreactivity and any of the parameters. The loss of GGT in so me of the cases is evidence that this enzyme is not required for mamma ry tumor development or maintenance. However, as GGT is a component of the pathways that metabolize glutathione and glutathione-conjugates, the difference in levels of the enzyme in invasive breast cancers may be one explanation for the variation in chemotherapy response that has been observed in patients treated for advanced mammary cancer.