PURPOSE: To assess the effect of knee magnetic resonance (MR) imaging
on the diagnosis and management of acute knee injury. MATERIALS AND ME
THODS: Two orthopedic knee surgeons prospectively completed pre-and po
st-MR imaging questionnaires on 84 of 91 consecutive patients with acu
te knee injury. The pre- and post-MR imaging clinical diagnoses, certa
inty regarding these diagnoses, other diagnostic tests, and subjective
impression of the usefulness of MR imaging were determined. RESULTS:
Seven hundred thirty-one of 840 pre-and post-MR imaging diagnoses agre
ed. Agreement was lowest for medial meniscal injuries (54 of 84). Sign
ificantly fewer meniscal injuries were suspected after MR imaging (P <
.05). In 60 patients, the orthopedist changed at least one of the 10
potential diagnoses after MR imaging. Clinical diagnostic certainty in
creased by a mean of 14% for all diagnoses. The increase in diagnostic
certainty was greatest for medial meniscal injuries (30%), followed b
y lateral meniscal injuries (21%). The proposed management changed in
41 patients, resulting in significantly fewer arthroscopic procedures
(P < .01). The post-MR imaging management plans included 37% (27 of 73
) fewer arthroscopic procedures. CONCLUSION: MR imaging affects the di
agnosis and management of acute knee injury by decreasing the number o
f arthroscopic procedures, improving clinician diagnostic certainty, a
nd assisting in management decisions.