SCHEDULE INDUCTION CONDITIONS NOT ONLY EXAGGERATE INTAKE BUT ALSO ENHANCE DRUG SOLUTION CHOICE

Citation
Jl. Falk et al., SCHEDULE INDUCTION CONDITIONS NOT ONLY EXAGGERATE INTAKE BUT ALSO ENHANCE DRUG SOLUTION CHOICE, Physiology & behavior, 62(3), 1997, pp. 479-483
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Biological","Behavioral Sciences",Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00319384
Volume
62
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
479 - 483
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-9384(1997)62:3<479:SICNOE>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
In previous research, rats exposed to daily, 3 h sessions of schedule induced polydipsia (SIP) self-administered high doses of cocaine orall y. However, a strong and durable preference for cocaine solution to wa ter requires training in addition to mere oral self-administration exp osure. If cocaine is dissolved in a preferred vehicle solution, and th e vehicle is subsequently faded to water, then a strong preference for cocaine remains. A similar preference can be instituted for lidocaine solution. Such preferences may develop because the gustatory property of a drug becomes associated with the preferred vehicle and remains t o function as a durable conditioned reinforcer after vehicle fading. T o determine if drug preference is solely a function of this posited co nditioning mechanism, or whether it also depends upon the STP conditio n, rats were exposed to daily, 3 h sessions of single-ration feeding, rather than the SIP condition. A preferred vehicle (glucose/saccharin solution) was slowly faded from a 0.19 mg/ml lidocaine solution, which was presented concurrently with a choice for water. Although a prefer ence for lidocaine solution to water could be generated, it occurred f or only 5 out of 9 rats, and the preference was relatively unstable. B y contrast, in two previous studies using SIP, 26 out of 27 rats maint ained a preference for lidocaine solution. Thus, SIP nor only exaggera tes the amount of drug solution ingested but also contributes to the f ixation of the associative drug solution choice. (C) 1997 Elsevier Sci ence Inc.