It has been suggested that if the preservation and development of cons
ciousness in the biological evolution is a result of natural selection
, it is plausible that consciousness not only has been influenced by n
eural processes, but has had a survival value itself; and it could onl
y have had this, if it had also been efficacious. This argument for mi
nd-brain interaction is examined, both as the argument has been develo
ped by William James and Karl Popper and as it has been discussed by C
. D. Broad. The problem of identifying mental phenomena with certain n
eural phenomena is also addressed. The main conclusion of the analysis
is that an explanation of the evolution of consciousness in Darwinian
terms of natural selection does not rule out that consciousness may h
ave evolved as a mere causally inert effect of the evolution of the ne
rvous system, or that mental phenomena are identical with certain neur
al phenomena. However, the interactionistic theory still seems, more p
lausible and more fruitful for other reasons brought up in the discuss
ion. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited.