The literature on the organization of the United States Congress has b
een dominated by ''distributive'' and ''informational'' theory. One im
portant source of disagreement between these two theories is their cha
racterization of whether individual legislators can engage in pork-bar
rel activities. Here we provide evidence which indicates that the pork
-barrel is alive and well in the contemporary United States Congress.
We focus on whether members of power and constituency committees can d
irect disproportionate federal expenditures to their districts. Findin
g strong and systematic evidence of pork-barrel activities by committe
e members provides empirical support for distributive theories of legi
slative organization.