In the original Tullock (1975, 1980) game, an individual bidder's prob
ability of winning with a bid b is proportional to b(R), where the exp
onent reflects economies of scale in rent seeking. Different interpret
ations can be given to these probabilities. First, one may view R as a
reflection of the political culture. Alternatively, one may view R as
a choice variable for a politician. Intuition suggests that a society
with a high tolerance for the selling of political favors and politic
ians who are receptive to rent seeking would both induce greater rent-
seeking expenditures than other societies, all else equal. This paper
shows that a lower value of R can actually lead to more rent dissipati
on than a higher value. This paper also reinforces two points concerni
ng rent seeking. First, the analysis confirms the robustness of under-
dissipation of rents, even in the face of entry. Second, it points out
the importance of distinguishing between rent-seeking expenditures an
d rent dissipation. When bidders must borrow, for example, total expen
diture may understate rent dissipation.