Jw. Robinson et Pj. Mccabe, SANDSTONE-BODY AND SHALE-BODY DIMENSIONS IN A BRAIDED FLUVIAL SYSTEM - SALT WASH SANDSTONE MEMBER (MORRISON FORMATION), GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, AAPG bulletin, 81(8), 1997, pp. 1267-1291
Citations number
95
Categorie Soggetti
Energy & Fuels","Geosciences, Interdisciplinary","Engineering, Petroleum
Excellent three-dimensional exposures of the Upper Jurassic Salt Wash
Sandstone Member of the Morrison Formation in the Henry Mountains area
of southern Utah allow measurement of the thickness and width of fluv
ial sandstone and shale bodies from extensive photomosaics. The Salt W
ash Sandstone Member is composed of fluvial channel fill, abandoned ch
annel fill, and overbank/floodplain strata that were deposited on a br
oad alluvial plain of low-sinuosity, sandy, braided streams flowing no
rtheast. A hierarchy of sandstone and shale bodies in the Salt Wash Sa
ndstone Member includes, in ascending order, trough cross-bedding, fin
ing-upward units/mudstone intraclast conglomerates, single-story sands
tone bodies/basal conglomerate, abandoned channel fill, multistory san
dstone bodies, and overbank/flood-plain heterolithic strata. Trough cr
oss-beds have an average width:thickness ratio (W:T) of 8.5:1 in the l
ower interval of the Salt Wash Sandstone Member and 10.4:1 in the uppe
r interval. Fining-up ward units are 0.5-3.0 m thick and 3-11 m wide.
Single-story sandstone bodies in the upper interval are wider and thic
ker than their counterparts in the lower interval, based on average W:
T, linear regression analysis, and cumulative relative frequency graph
s. Multistory sandstone bodies are composed of two to eight stories, r
ange up to 30 m thick and over 1500 m wide (W:T > 50:1), and are also
larger in the upper interval. Heterolithic units between sandstone bod
ies include abandoned channel fill (W:T = 33:1) and overbank/flood-pla
in deposits (W:T = 70:1). Understanding W:T ratios from the component
parts of an ancient, sandy, braided stream deposit can be applied in s
everal ways to similar strata in other basins; for example, to (I) det
ermine the width of a unit when only the thickness is known, (2) creat
e correlation guidelines and maximum correlation lengths, (3) aid in i
nterpreting the controls on fluvial architecture, and (4) place additi
onal constraints on input variables to stratigraphic and fluid-flow mo
deling. The usefulness of these types of data demonstrates the need to
develop more data sets from other depositional environments.