Bw. Beasley et al., PROMOTION CRITERIA FOR CLINICIAN-EDUCATORS IN THE UNITED-STATES AND CANADA - A SURVEY OF PROMOTION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSONS, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 278(9), 1997, pp. 723-728
Context.-Clinician-educators have concerns about their ability to be p
romoted and the criteria used by medical school promotion committees.
Objective.-To discover the criteria and methods that medical school pr
omotion committees use to make decisions about the promotion of clinic
ian-educators. Methods.-In June 1996 we mailed a questionnaire to chai
rpersons of all medical school promotion committees in the United Stat
es and Canada. Results.-Of 142 schools surveyed, 115 (81%) responded;
45% of respondents had a clinician-educator promotion track. On a scal
e from 1 (minimally important) to 7 (extremely important), the mean im
portance ratings of aspects of clinician-educators' performance were t
he following: teaching skills (6.3), clinical skills (5.8), mentoring
(5.7), academic administration (5.3), developing educational programs
(5.3), nonresearch scholarship (5.1), clinical research (4.8), service
coordination (4.7), and education research (4.5). Methods to evaluate
each aspect of performance were rated by respondents for importance a
nd frequency of use, The 4 most important methods for evaluating teach
ing were awards, peer evaluation, learner evaluation, and teaching por
tfolio, 70% or more of schools used these frequently or always. The 4
most important methods of evaluating clinical skills were peer evaluat
ion, awards, trainee evaluation, and objective measures, which were us
ed frequently or always by 78%, 65%, 58%, and 29% of schools, respecti
vely. Clinician-educators were expected to have fewer peer-reviewed pu
blications to be promoted than investigators (5.7 vs 10.6, P<.001). Sc
hools with separate clinician-educator tracks differed little in surve
y responses from schools without such tracks. Conclusion-Most, but not
all, promotion committees now assign high importance to the special c
ontributions of clinician-educators and use a variety of methods to as
sess these, regardless of whether they have a separate clinician-educa
tor promotion track.