EVALUATION OF ATRAZINE POSITIVE AND FALSE-POSITIVE IMMUNOASSAY DETECTIONS IN-GROUND WATER

Authors
Citation
Dw. Watts et Jm. Novak, EVALUATION OF ATRAZINE POSITIVE AND FALSE-POSITIVE IMMUNOASSAY DETECTIONS IN-GROUND WATER, Journal of environmental science and health. Part B. Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes, 32(5), 1997, pp. 659-671
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture,"Environmental Sciences","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
03601234
Volume
32
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
659 - 671
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-1234(1997)32:5<659:EOAPAF>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
False positive responses on an atrazine hyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-t riazine-2,4-diamine) immunoassay kit were investigated to explain poss ible causes for these occurrences. Ground water samples were evaluated with the immunoassay kit and positive responses (>0.20 mu g L-1) were confirmed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Non-con firming samples (false positives) were analyzed for seven additional c ompounds on GC. Resulting GC/MS and GC analyses showed that 70% of the false positives could be attributed to two compounds. Prometon ,N'-bi s(1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) was responsible for the m ajority (64%) of the false positive responses. The atrazine metabolite , deethylatrazine 2-chloro-4-amino-6-isopropylamino-1,3,5-triazine), w as responsible for the other 6% of the false positives measured. Unatt ributed false positives (30%) were probably due to an overestimation o f pesticide concentrations in the kit's lower detection range.