The use of a respiratory screening questionnaire is recommended annual
ly to screen bakery workers in the UK. We compared questionnaire scree
ning with other methods of detecting workers with asthmatic symptoms a
nd then assessed the significance of these symptoms with careful inves
tigation and follow-up. Reasons for questionnaire failures were then e
xplored. A questionnaire was issued to 362 flour-exposed workers in a
large bakery. Ai I positive respondents to respiratory symptom questio
ns were interviewed by an occupational nurse. Workers with occupationa
lly related symptoms al this interview were referred to the chest clin
ic. In addition, workers with negative questionnaires were screened us
ing attendance records, sick notes and direct workplace observations.
Workers with frequent absence from work or sick notes with respiratory
diagnoses we re interviewed in the same manner as those answering the
questionnaire positively and then referred to clinic. At clinic, a di
agnosis was made for each worker on the basis of clinical assessment,
spirometry, serial peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) analysis and radio
allergosorbent testing (RAST) testing for specific IgE. Using the clin
ic diagnoses, the referral routes were audited to assess the rates of
case detection of asthma and occupational asthma. The respiratory scre
ening questionnaire identified 68 workers with respiratory symptoms. O
f these, 21 proceeded to full assessment. A diagnosis oi asthma was ma
de in five cases, one of which was bakers' asthma. In addition, 11 wor
kers not reporting any symptoms by questionnaire were referred to clin
ic and five were diagnosed as having asthma. Screening questionnaires
may lead to an underestimate oi the prevalence oi asthmatic symptoms a
nd as such should not be used alone in workplace screening.