Vc. Petropoulos et al., COMPARISON OF RETENTION AND RELEASE PERIODS FOR IMPLANT OVERDENTURE ATTACHMENTS, The International journal of oral and maxillofacial implants, 12(2), 1997, pp. 176-185
The aim of this study mas to compare tile retention and release period
s of the Nobel Biocare bar and clip (NBC), Nobel Biocare ball (NB), Ze
st anchor (ZA), Zest magnet (ZM), and Sterngold ERA (SE) attachments o
n art implant-retained overdenture model. The attachments were tested
using two permanently placed Branemark implants on a test model that w
as attached to an Instron machine (cross-head speed 50.8 mm/minute). E
ach attachment had one part embedded in a denturelike housing, and the
other part screwed into the implants, Dislodging tensile forces were
applied to the housings in two directions simulating function vertical
and oblique, Eight tests were done in two directions with three sampl
es of each attachment. The dislodging forces generated measurements of
the peak load, break load, and displacement at peak load and break lo
ad. Release periods were calculated using displacements between the pe
ak load and break load and the cross-head speed. Results showed the NB
C to be significantly most retentive for the break load when subjected
to vertical and oblique forces with mean values and standard deviatio
ns of 2104.5 +/- 506.7 g and 1958.1 +/- 165.4 g, respectively. Next mo
st retentive was the SE, followed by the ZA and NE. The ZM was signifi
cantly least retentive (127.8 +/- 7.0 g and 143.5 +/- 19.7 g). For the
release period, results showed the NBC to have significantly the fast
est release period for vertical and oblique forces (1.86 x 10(-3) and
1.35 x 10(-4) minutes). The ZM significantly had the slowest release p
eriod for those forces (3.02 x 10(-2) and 2.35 x 10(-2) minutes). The
data suggested that the NBC could be selected when a high degree of re
tention and fast release period are desired. The next most retentive w
as the SE;ZM was the least retentive and had the slowest release perio
d.