Objective: To evaluate the merits of screening for toxoplasmosis in al
l pregnant women. Methods: We used decision analysis to compare three
strategies for the antepartum management of congenital toxoplasmosis:
1) no testing for congenital toxoplasmosis; 2) current practice, which
is to perform targeted screening in cases of incidental abnormalities
noted on ultrasound; and 3) universal serologic screening of pregnant
women followed by amniocentesis to diagnose fetal infection in cases
of maternal seroconversion. For each of the three strategies, we consi
dered the two available treatment options: intrauterine antiparasitic
treatment or pregnancy termination. Results: Universal screening reduc
ed the total number of cases of congenital toxoplasmosis compared with
no testing or targeted screening. However, compared with no testing,
universal screening with medical treatment resulted in 18.5 additional
pregnancy losses for each case of toxoplasmosis avoided. If infected
pregnancies underwent Germination, universal screening resulted in 12.
1 additional pregnancy losses for each case avoided. Conclusion: Mater
nal screening reduces the number of cases of disease, but at a substan
tial clinical cost. The rarity of the disease and limitations in diagn
osis and therapy limit the effectiveness of screening strategies. The
risks associated with amniocentesis are particularly important. Univer
sal maternal screening for congenital toxoplasmosis should not be perf
ormed. ((C) 1997 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecolo
gists).