Ga. Pietersz et al., COMPARISON OF THE BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF 2 ANTI-MUCIN-1 ANTIBODIES PREPARED FOR IMAGING AND THERAPY, Cancer immunology and immunotherapy, 44(6), 1997, pp. 323-328
A comparison was made between the murine anti-MUC1 antibody BC2 (which
reacts with the peptide epitope APDTR) and the ''humanised'' antibody
hCTMO1 from CellTech, which reacts with the MUC1 epitope RPAP. Prelim
inary studies demonstrated that hCTMO1 was a ''good'' antibody whereas
BC2 was not. Various parameters were determined and conclusions reach
ed. (a) Affinity: the affinity of hCTMO1 was 2.60x10(7)M(-1) and that
of BC2 was 1.36x10(7)M(-1): we did not consider these numbers to be su
bstantially different, although hCTMO1 was clearly of higher affinity
than BC2. (b) On/off rate at 4 degrees C: both antibodies bound effect
ively to the MUG-1 transfectant MOR5-CF2; the association rate for hCT
MO1 was 3.8 times that of BC2 and the dissociation rate for BC2 was tw
ice as fast as that of hCTMO1. (c) On/off rates at 37 degrees C: at 37
degrees C the association rate for hCTMO1 was greater than that of BC
2. (d) Internalization: hCTMO1 was also more efficient at internalisin
g bound antibody; 70% of bound hCTMO1 was internalised, whilst 6% of b
ound BC2 was internalised. From these studies it was clear that, while
hCTMO1 was of similar affinity to BC2, the faster uptake and internal
isation and lower off rate indicated that it was likely to be a superi
or antibody; this was proven in vivo. (e) Localisation: hCTMO1 bound m
uch better in vivo than BC2 (68% compared to 28%). (f) Therapeutic exp
eriments: BC2-idarubicin conjugates were essentially ineffective in er
adicating tumours in mice whereas hCTMO1-idarubicin had a dramatic eff
ect on breast cancer tumour cells growing in mice. We conclude that th
e simple measurements on/off rates and internalisation at 37 degrees C
are the most important parameters to use to determine antibody effect
iveness, prior to embarking on clinical studies.