An extensive series of simulations was performed of underground explos
ions in salt, using both chemical and nuclear explosives. In both case
s, the radius of the initial emplacement cavity was varied from the fu
lly tamped configuration to as large as 80 m/kt1/3; when not fully tam
ped, the cavity was assumed initially to contain air at ambient temper
ature and pressure. In the nuclear source case, the simulations are sh
own to be in good agreement with the Salmon/Sterling events conducted
by the United States and with recently released Russian data on a simi
lar pair of explosions in an Azgir salt dome. Simulation of the U.S. C
owboy series of chemical explosions in a Louisiana salt mine are also
shown to be in very good agreement with the experimental data; however
, the constitutive model for the salt that best explains these data is
different from that derived for Salmon; both salt models are amply su
pported by laboratory and field data. The main result of these simulat
ions is that cavity decoupling with chemical explosives is much less e
fficient than with nuclear explosives. Although maximum decoupling fac
tors, f(max) near 200 may be attainable with either of the two sources
, the cavity size required to achieve this value appears to be >40 m/k
t 1/3. For cavity radii half as large, f(max), is roughly 4 times lowe
r with nuclear explosives, and lower by another factor of 4 with chemi
cal sources. Moreover, if the initial cavity radius is a more modest 1
0 m/kt1/3, f(max) < 3 even with a nuclear source.