M. Kashir et Ek. Yanful, A FLOW PUMP SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING CLAY BARRIER-PERMEANT COMPATIBILITY, ASTM geotechnical testing journal, 20(2), 1997, pp. 179-190
This paper presents the performance, reliability, and features of a hy
draulic conductivity, k, testing equipment specially designed and fabr
icated for clay barrier-permeant compatibility studies. The key compon
ent of the equipment is a flow or infusion/withdrawal pump that is use
d to deliver a constant and continuous flow of permeant at some prescr
ibed rate through two stainless steel syringes to a soil specimen. The
pump has a switch that allows the motor direction to be changed to al
low one syringe to empty while the other is filling. This provides an
uninterrupted flow of permeant to the specimen, unlike most traditiona
l testing equipment that requires complete stoppage of permeation in o
rder to provide a fresh supply of permeant. In some cases, re-establis
hment of flow pressures can take a long time and therefore affect the
attainment of chemical equilibrium and specimen volume changes during
compatibility testing. A Plexiglas cell containing an inflatable rubbe
r diaphragm is used in the present equipment as a permeant supply tank
to prevent the exposure of the permeant to air, therefore making the
equipment particularly suited for testing with volatile organic liquid
s and redox-sensitive permeants such as acid mine drainage. Furthermor
e, this cell is connected to a back pressure supply to decrease the ti
me required for the pressure to return to its original value after swi
tching gears. The advantage of the equipment includes a graphic-based
data acquisition system that allows test parameters such as hydraulic
gradient, hydraulic conductivity, volume change, and room temperature
to be continuously monitored and displayed on a computer monitor scree
n. The performance and features of the equipment are demonstrated with
a series of k-tests on clayey soil specimens permeated with water and
then with acid mine drainage (AMD). The data indicated that, while AM
D did not change k, it may have dissolved some primary soil minerals s
uch as calcite and dolomite, which in turn buffered the pH of the effl
uent from a specimen permeated with more than ten pore volumes of AMD.