THE ROLE OF FLUORINE-18-DEOXYGLUCOSE (FDG) POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) WHOLE-BODY SCAN (WBS) IN THE STAGING AND FOLLOW-UP OF CANCER-PATIENTS - OUR FIRST EXPERIENCE
G. Ferlin et al., THE ROLE OF FLUORINE-18-DEOXYGLUCOSE (FDG) POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY (PET) WHOLE-BODY SCAN (WBS) IN THE STAGING AND FOLLOW-UP OF CANCER-PATIENTS - OUR FIRST EXPERIENCE, Tumori, 83(3), 1997, pp. 679-684
We report the results of FDG PET whole body scan in 75 cancer patients
in whom tumor extent was defined by surgical, histological or cytolog
ical findings and clinical follow-up. Twenty-five had malignant lympho
mas, 24 lung carcinomas, and 26 other types of solid tumors. Twenty-th
ree patients were evaluated at disease onset, before therapy, and 37 a
t the moment of tumor recurrence; the remaining 15 patients were in co
mplete remission after treatment and were taken as controls. Visual an
d quantitative PET results were compared with conventional imaging (US
, CT scan and/or MRI, and Tc99m MDP bone scan). In the 60 patients wit
h active disease, PET as well as conventional imaging were able to loc
ate the primary tumor in all 23 patients studied at disease onset. How
ever, with regard to lymph node and distant metastases, PET provided t
he same information as conventional imaging in 31 cases (51.6%), but r
evealed further neoplastic foci in 29 cases (48.4%), 21 in lymph nodes
and 8 at distant sites. The sensitivity of PET, in comparison with co
nventional imaging, was 100% versus 100% for the detection of the prim
ary tumor, 97.6% versus 55.8% for the localization of node metastases,
and 100% versus 55.5% for the visualization of distant metastases. Th
e specificity, calculated in the group of 15 disease-free patients, wa
s 100% far PET and 86.6% for conventional imaging. The therapeutic app
roach was modified in 12 patients (20%) on the basis of the PET result
s. Furthermore, in 14 cases (23.3%) with advanced disease, PET provide
d complete information on tumor spread, otherwise obtainable only by t
aking together the results of all other diagnostic procedures. Our dat
a indicate a higher accuracy of FDG PET whole body scan compared to co
nventional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic spread b
oth at initial diagnosis and during followup, with an important impact
on therapeutic decision-making. Moreover, by providing complete infor
mation on tumor spread in some cases, PET can become a profitable tool
in terms of cost reduction.