THE PLACE OF INTERRATER RELIABILITY IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY

Citation
D. Armstrong et al., THE PLACE OF INTERRATER RELIABILITY IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH - AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY, Sociology, 31(3), 1997, pp. 597-606
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Sociology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00380385
Volume
31
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
597 - 606
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-0385(1997)31:3<597:TPOIRI>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Assessing inter-rater reliability, whereby data are independently code d and the codings compared for agreement, is a recognised process in q uantitative research. However, its applicability to qualitative resear ch is less clear: should researchers be expected to identify the same codes or themes in a transcript or should they be expected to produce different accounts! Some qualitative researchers argue that assessing inter-rater reliability is an important method for ensuring rigour, ot hers that it is unimportant; and yet it has never been formally examin ed in an empirical qualitative study. Accordingly, to explore the degr ee of inter-rater reliability that might be expected, six researchers were asked to identify themes in the same focus group transcript. The results showed close agreement on the basic themes but each analyst 'p ackaged' the themes differently.