Aim: The British Andrology Society recommends screening semen donors f
or sexually transmitted infections to minimise the risk of pathogen tr
ansmission to the mother and fetus. The aim was to review recent findi
ngs of semen donor screening and, if appropriate, recommend changes to
the screening protocol. Subjects: 175 consecutive men attending for S
TD screening between January 1992 and December 1995 who had been prese
lected by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology as suitable sem
en donors. Methods: Retrospective review of case notes and group compa
rison of demographic and sexual history data. Results: 11 men (6%) had
evidence of infection, excluding CMV seropositivity, at their first S
TD screen. After semen donation, 109 men (63%) were rescreened and, of
these, 12% had positive findings. Positive findings at initial screen
ing were predicted by a history of more than one partner in the preced
ing 6 months (OR 7.11, 95% CI 1.66-30.4) but it did not predict rescre
ening findings. Other factors such as age, marital status, employment
status or past STDs were not predictive for either screen. Discussion:
Less than 20% of initial volunteers meet the full criteria of high qu
ality post-thaw semen, no transmissible genetic disorders, and no tran
smissible pathogens. Sexual history may predict but would not alone pr
eclude all positive STD screening findings. It is essential that seque
ntial STD screening of donors continues and that genitourinary physici
ans should be involved in this process. Validation of newer diagnostic
techniques as screening tests in this setting is required.