A. Lombardo et al., CONTRACTILE RESERVE OF DYSFUNCTIONAL MYOCARDIUM AFTER REVASCULARIZATION - A DOBUTAMINE STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY STUDY, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30(3), 1997, pp. 633-640
Objectives. We sought to investigate the effects of revascularization
on the contractile reserve of dysfunctional myocardium. Background. Th
e improvement in dysfunctional but viable myocardium after revasculari
zation is frequently less than expected from the amount of contractile
reserve detected on dobutamine stress echocardiography. The fate of t
he contractile reserve, when it does not result in an adequate contrac
tile recovery, is unknown. Methods. Basal contraction and contractile
reserve of infarct zones were assessed by dobutamine stress echocardio
graphy in 21 postinfarction male patients before and >3 months after r
evascularization (30 infarct zones; mean +/-SD left ventricular ejecti
on fraction 35 +/- 8%). An infarct zone wall motion score index (WMSI)
was calculated. Results. Before revascularization, contractile reserv
e was present in 14 infarct zones (12 patients) and absent in 16 (9 pa
tients). After revascularization, ejection fraction increased by 5 +/-
4% (p < 0.01) in patients classified as positive for contractile rese
rve and remained unchanged in those classified as negative. New York H
eart Association classification improved in 58.3% and 22.2% of patient
s, respectively, Basal contraction improved in eight zones with previo
us contractile reserve (57.1%) and in one zone without (6.3%) (p < 0.0
1), Contractile reserve was still evident in 13 zones with previous co
ntractile reserve (93%; 8 with contractile recovery), and it developed
in 6 zones without (38%; none with contractile recovery). WMSI values
after revascularization were decreased from values before revasculari
zation during low dose dobutamine in zones with and without previous c
ontractile reserve (p < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively). Conclusions. A
fter revascularization, contractile reserve is maintained or even incr
eases in viable infarct zones that do not recover as expected. It may
also develop in some infarct zones judged not to be viable before reva
scularization. This increased contractile reserve may play a role in t
he functional improvement of patients after revascularization. (C) 199
7 by the American College of Cardiology.