DIFFERENCES IN MYOCARDIAL VELOCITY-GRADIENT MEASURED THROUGHOUT THE CARDIAC CYCLE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY, ATHLETES AND PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY DUE TO HYPERTENSION
P. Palka et al., DIFFERENCES IN MYOCARDIAL VELOCITY-GRADIENT MEASURED THROUGHOUT THE CARDIAC CYCLE IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY, ATHLETES AND PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY DUE TO HYPERTENSION, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 30(3), 1997, pp. 760-768
Objectives. We sought to compare the myocardial velocity gradient (MVG
) measured across the left ventricular (LV) posterior wall during the
cardiac cycle between patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM),
athletes and patients with LV hypertrophy due to systemic hypertensio
n and to determine whether it might be used to discriminate these grou
ps. Background. The MVG is a new ultrasound variable, based on the col
or Doppler technique, that quantifies the spatial distribution of tran
smyocardial velocities. Methods. A cohort of 158 subjects was subdivid
ed by age into two groups: Group I (mean [+/-SD] 30 +/- 7 years) and G
roup II (58 +/- 8 years). Within each group there were three categorie
s of subjects: Group la consisted of patients with HCM (n = 25), Group
Ib consisted of athletes (n = 21), and Group Ic consisted of normal s
ubjects; Group IIa consisted of patients with HCM (n = 19), Group IIb
consisted of hypertensive patients (n = 27), and Group IIc consisted o
f normal subjects (n = 33). Results. The MVG (mean [+/-SD] s(-1)) meas
ured in systole was lower (p < 0.01) in patients with HCM (Group Ia 3.
2 +/- 1.1; Group IIa 2.9 +/- 1.2) compared with athletes (Group Ib 4.6
+/- 1.1), hypertensive patients (Group IIb 4.2 +/- 1.8) and normal su
bjects (Group Ic 4.4 +/- 0.8; Group Ile 4.8 +/- 0.8), In early diastol
e, the MVG was lower (p < 0.05) in patients with HCM (Group Ia 3.7 +/-
1.5; Group IIa 2.6 +/- 0.9) than in athletes (Group Ib 9.9 +/- 1.9) a
nd normal subjects (Group Ic 9.2 +/- 2.0; Group IIc 3.6 +/- 1.5), but
not hypertensive patients (Group IIb 3.3 +/- 1.3), In fate diastole, t
he MVG in patients with HCM (Group Ia 1.3 +/- 0.8; Group IIa 1.4 +/- 0
.8) was lower (p < 0.01) than that in hypertensive patients (Group IIb
4.3 +/- 1.7) and normal subjects (Group IIc 3.5 +/- 0.9), An MVG less
than or equal to 7 s(-1), as a single diagnostic approach, differenti
ated accurately (0.96 positive and 0.94 negative predictive value) bet
ween patients with HCM and athletes when the measurements were taken d
uring early diastole. Conclusions. In both age groups, the MVG was low
er in both systole and diastole in patients with HCM than in athletes,
hypertensive patients or normal subjects, The MVG measured in early d
iastole in a group of subjects 18 to 45 years old would appear to be a
n accurate variable used to discriminate between HCM and hypertrophy i
n athletes. (C) 1997 by the American College of Cardiology.