Two logically opposed interpretations of the meaning of current (soft
and critical) systems thinking are drawn: thinking about the holistic
power structure that constitutes the ground for the possibility of a s
ituation and thinking how to accommodate conflicting parties into a gi
ven order. The epochal coexistence of these two apparently logically o
pposed modes of thinking are interpreted under a historical-ontologica
l perspective. It is shown how the failure of the project of the Enlig
htenment has led to the constitution of a postmodern order dominated b
y instrumental thinking and absolute relativism, under the shadow of a
few key notions of the project of the Enlightenment that rapidly beco
me 'plastic' words in-forming the mass media publicity game. (C) 1997
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.