M. Vanballegooijen et al., PRESENT EVIDENCE ON THE VALUE OF HPV TESTING FOR CERVICAL-CANCER SCREENING - A MODEL-BASED EXPLORATION OF THE (COST-)EFFECTIVENESS, British Journal of Cancer, 76(5), 1997, pp. 651-657
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main risk factor for invasive cervic
al cancer, High risk ratios are found in cross-sectional data on HPV p
revalence. The question raised is whether this present evidence is suf
ficient for making firm recommendations on HPV screening. A validated
cervical cancer screening model was extended by adding HPV infection a
s a possible precursor of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Tw
o widely different model quantifications were constructed so that both
were compatible with the observed HPV risk ratios. One model assumed
a much longer duration of HPV infection before progressing to CIN and
a higher sensitivity of the HPV test than the other. In one version of
the model, the calculated mortality reduction from HPV screening was
higher and the (cost-)effectiveness was much better than for Pap smear
screening. in the other version, outcomes were the opposite, although
the cost-effectiveness of the combined HPV + cytology test was close
to that of Pap smear screening. Although small follow-up studies and s
tudies with limited strength of design suggest that HPV testing may we
ll improve cervical cancer screening, only large longitudinal screenin
g studies on the association between HPV infection and the development
of neoplasias can give outcomes that would enable a firm conclusion t
o be made on the (cost-)effectiveness of HPV screening. Prospective st
udies should address women aged 30-60 years.