Rj. Hekkenberg et al., INFORMED CONSENT IN HEAD AND NECK-SURGERY - HOW MUCH DO PATIENTS ACTUALLY REMEMBER, Journal of otolaryngology, 26(3), 1997, pp. 155-159
Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of i
nformed consent in head and neck Surgery by testing patient recall of
potential complications from thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, and par
otidectomy. Design: A prospective design was used. Setting: The settin
g was an academic tertiary care centre. Methods: Fifty-four patients u
ndergoing thyroidectomy, parathyroidectomy, or parotidectomy were cons
ented by verbal contact by the operating surgeon with a specific preop
erative checklist of complication and side effects. One week to 2 mont
hs after consent, the patients were surveyed for recall of potential c
omplications. Main Outcome Measures: Rate of recall was related to var
ious including patient age, sex, level of education, occupation, and l
ength of time from the consent interview to the recall interview. Resu
lts: The overall recall rate for all procedures was 48%. Those patient
s who recalled over 50% of the complications were younger (p = .04) an
d better educated (p = .04). The gender of the patients did not appear
to influence recall success (p = 1.00), even when facial scar or para
lysis was considered. Conclusion: A significant relationship exists be
tween education level and patient age and the rate of patient recall o
f potential complications of surgery.