Bec. Plaat et al., CLINICAL OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS IN RELATION TO TUMOR GRADE, DNA-PLOIDY AND KARYOTYPE, International journal of cancer, 74(4), 1997, pp. 396-402
The most important prognostic factor in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is
tumor grade. Since most grading methods are subject to the interpretat
ion of the individual pathologist, there is a need for objective crite
ria such as DNA ploidy and karyotype, which are of prognostic value in
several types of malignancy. We have analyzed the relationships among
tumor grade, DNA ploidy, cytogenetic abnormalities and the clinical o
utcome of 44 previously untreated patients with 12 different histologi
cal types of primary STS. The tumors were graded according to the meth
od of Coindre, which resulted in 9 grade 1 (20%), 18 grade II (41%) an
d 17 grade III (39%) STS. DNA flow cytometry and chromosomal analysis
were performed using standard techniques. After a median follow-up tim
e of 39 (range, 2-124) months, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was perf
ormed. Significant differences in 5-year overall survival were found b
etween patients with grade I or II and grade III STS (p < 0.05), Seven
teen STS were aneuploid and 26 were euploid, in 21 of 39 successfully
cultured STS an abnormal karyotype was found. There were no significan
t differences in survival in relation to DNA ploidy or the presence of
chromosomal abnormalities. Our results show that grading had higher p
rognostic value than DNA ploidy or the presence of cytogenetic abnorma
lities in this heterogeneous group of STS. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.