Pg. Friedman et al., A COMPARISON OF LIGHT WAND AND SUSPENSION LARYNGOSCOPIC INTUBATION TECHNIQUES IN OUTPATIENTS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 85(3), 1997, pp. 578-582
Endotracheal intubation can produce postoperative sore throat and hoar
seness, as well as changes in cardiovascular variables. A major goal o
f ambulatory surgery is the prompt return of patients to their daily a
ctivities. Postoperative sore throat may impede this and may decrease
patient satisfaction with their anesthetic and surgical experience. We
conducted a prospective, randomized study in 40 outpatients having lo
wer extremity arthroscopies to compare the effects of direct laryngosc
opy and light wand intubation on cardiovascular changes, sore throat,
hoarseness, and dysphagia. Subjects were randomly assigned to either G
roup A (endotracheal intubation by rigid laryngoscopy) or Group B (end
otracheal intubation with a light wand). A standardized anesthetic tec
hnique was used. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded before in
duction, after induction but before endotracheal intubation, and at 1-
min intervals for the first 5 min after intubation. Sixteen to twenty-
four hours postoperatively, the incidence and severity of sore throat,
hoarseness, and dysphagia was assessed by a follow-up phone call. Thi
s study demonstrated no clinically significant difference in cardiovas
cular variables between the two techniques. Patients had a significant
ly lower incidence and severity of sore threat, hoarseness, and dyspha
gia when a light wand was used for intubation. In conclusion, this stu
dy suggests that light wand intubation may decrease the incidence and
severity of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and dysphagia, ther
eby potentially increasing satisfaction in ambulatory surgical patient
s. Implications: This prospective, randomized study found that the inc
idence and severity of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and diff
iculty in swallowing among ambulatory surgical patients is more freque
nt when they are endotracheally intubated with a rigid laryngoscope th
an with a light wand. The authors, therefore, recommend more frequent
use of the light wand for endotracheal intubation.