This article aims to link the micro-level changes in firms, as the sou
rce of production behavior, with meso-level changes in industrial stru
cture and macro-level changes in growth and development performance. I
t focuses on the three great industrial revolutions of the last quarte
r of the present millennium. These differed among themselves in almost
every major way, which inhibits generalization but shows that systems
(here the ''national systems of production'') are very different, and
that ''convergence'' of a later industrializing country upon its pred
ecessor is improbable. Each industrial revolution possesses considerab
le internal logic but is less flexible in regard to adopting features
of its successor. As a result, mismatches arise over time between the
specified constituents of the production systems, as demonstrated by e
conomic phenomena such as unemployment and political phenomena such as
ideology. The task of resolving such mismatches has fallen back on th
e micro level of firms and households, which itself has imposed seriou
s strains on the productive system. Such heterogeneity imposes severe
limitations on the ability to link technological forecasting and socia
l change in the long term. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Inc.