HOW WELL DO WE MEASURE TRAINING

Citation
Jm. Barron et al., HOW WELL DO WE MEASURE TRAINING, Journal of labor economics, 15(3), 1997, pp. 507-528
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Industrial Relations & Labor",Economics
Journal title
ISSN journal
0734306X
Volume
15
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Part
1
Pages
507 - 528
Database
ISI
SICI code
0734-306X(1997)15:3<507:HWDWMT>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
This article compares various measures of on-the-job training, from a new source that matches establishments and workers, allowing us to com pare the responses of employers and employees to identical training qu estions. Establishments report 25% more hours of training than do work ers, although workers and establishments report similar incidence rate s of training. Both establishment and worker measures agree that there is much more informal training than formal training. Further, informa l training is measured about as accurately as formal training. Finally , we show that measurement error reduces substantially the observed ef fect of training, in particular the effect of training on productivity growth.