Tl. Wheeler et al., A COMPARISON OF WARNER-BRATZLER SHEAR FORCE ASSESSMENT WITHIN AND AMONG INSTITUTIONS, Journal of animal science, 75(9), 1997, pp. 2423-2432
Our objective was to compare measurement of Warner-Bratzler shear forc
e of beef longissimus within and among institutions when each institut
ion used its own protocol and when all institutions used a standardize
d protocol. In Exp. 1, each of five institutions (A, B, C, D, and E) r
eceived two adjacent steaks from each of 27 beef strip loins (longissi
mus lumborum). Warner-Bratzler shear force was measured for both steak
s using the procedures normally used at each institution. In Exp. 2, e
ach institution received two adjacent steaks from each of 45 strip loi
ns. Shear force was measured for both steaks using a standardized prot
ocol. In Exp. 1, Warner-Bratzler shear force was highest (P < .05) for
A (4.7 kg) and lowest (P < .05) for B (2.9 kg). Repeatability of shea
r force was highest for A and C (.73 and .72), intermediate for D (.63
), and lowest for B and E (.39 and .44). In Exp. 2, Warner-Bratzler sh
ear force was highest (P < .05) for A (5.1 kg) and lowest (P < .05) fo
r E (3.7 kg). Repeatability of shear force was highest for A (.87), in
termediate for B, D, and E (.81, .75, and .80), and lowest for C (.67)
. Shear force values differed within and among institutions due to pro
tocol, execution of the protocol, and instrument variation. Thus, comp
arisons of Warner-Bratzler shear force data among institutions are cur
rently not valid. However, it is possible for institutions to obtain t
he same mean shear force value and have high repeatability if a standa
rd protocol is properly executed with calibrated equipment.