Rt. Kridli et Dm. Hallford, LUTEINIZING-HORMONE AND OVARIAN RESPONSES OF EARLY POSTPARTUM DEBOUILLET EWES TREATED WITH CYPROHEPTADINE AND(OR) MELATONIN, Journal of animal science, 75(9), 1997, pp. 2535-2540
Two trials were conducted to evaluate the effects of cyproheptadine (s
erotonin receptor antagonist, Trial 1) along with administering melato
nin (Trial 2) to early postpartum (PP) ewes on LH profiles and follicu
lar development. In Trial 1, 12 mature ewes received either control(CO
N) or cyproheptadine (CYP) treatments (six ewes/treatment). Beginning
on d 5 PP, each ewe received i.v. either 0 (vehicle) or .1 mg of CYP/k
g BW twice daily for 5 d. Cyproheptadine tended to stimulate (P < .10)
release of LH on d 5 PP (1.3 and .8 +/- .2 ng LH/mL for CYP-treated a
nd CON ewes, respectively) with a similar trend (P < .10) of LH releas
e occurring on d 9. Cyproheptadine also had a positive effect on folli
cular development, but no luteal activity was detected. In Trial 2, 16
mature ewes received CON, i.v. CYP (.1 mg/kg BW twice daily), i.m, me
latonin (MEL, 5 mg.ewe(-1).d(-1)), or CYP+MEL. Treatments were adminis
tered from d 5 through 14 PP, Cyproheptadine tended to increase (P < .
10) LH pulsatility on d 5 and 14, but MEL had no effect (P > .20). Fol
licular development was not affected (P > .40) by CYP or MEL treatment
s. Neither MEL nor CYP affected progesterone (P > .60). Cyproheptadine
tended to increase LH concentration and pulse frequency in early PP e
wes, but MEL had no effect on LH profiles. Both treatments failed to i
nitiate ovarian cyclicity in early PP ewes.