Mb. Porter et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY BETWEEN PONY MARES AND EWES EVALUATING GONADOTROPICRESPONSE TO ADMINISTRATION OF GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE, Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 110(2), 1997, pp. 219-229
This study compared equine and ovine LH secretory responses to GnRH tr
eatment. Dioestrous mares and ewes were challenged with continuous GnR
H for 15 h. Mares that received constant GnRH (110 mu g h(-1)) had sus
tained LH secretion (P < 0.01), whereas LH concentrations in ewes trea
ted with continuous GnRH (25 mu g h(-1)) initially increased, then dec
lined and remained low, suggesting GnRH receptor desensitization or do
wnregulation. In addition, progesterone-primed, ovariectomized mares a
nd ewes were challenged with pulsatile or continuous GnRH for 5 days.
Plasma LH concentrations were increased by day 5 in mares treated with
pulsatile (25 mu g pulse(-1) h(-1)) and continuous (110 mu g h(-1)) G
nRH (P<0.01). Furthermore, mean LH concentrations and time-response cu
rves were not different. In contrast, ewes treated with continuous GnR
H (2.5 mu g h(-1)) demonstrated LH secretory patterns indicative of Gn
RH receptor downregulation on day I of treatment. LH concentrations in
ewes treated with pulsatile GnRH (250 ng pulse(-1) h(-1)) did not dif
fer from controls. In conclusion, pony mares responded continuously to
GnRH treatment (pulsatile and continuous), whereas ewes treated with
continuous GnRH experienced reduced LH secretion. These findings sugge
st a unique hypothalamic-pituitary axis in pony mares.