C. Mccusker et al., SPECIFIC ANTIBODY-RESPONSES TO DIPHTHERIA TETANUS REVACCINATION IN CHILDREN EVALUATED FOR IMMUNODEFICIENCY/, Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 79(2), 1997, pp. 145-150
Background: Assaying specific antibody levels against well-defined ant
igens such as diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), and more recently Haemophil
us is used as one indicator of humoral immune reactivity when evaluati
ng patients for immunodeficiency. The nature of the response to booste
r vaccine in this group of patients is not well defined. Objective: To
define the response to D/T booster vaccination in patients with nonpr
otective antibody levels in order to distinguish immunocompetent from
immunodeficient children. Methods: Patients between the ages of 16 mon
ths and 17 years referred for possible immunodeficiency were assessed
for specific antibody levels as part of a standard immunologic evaluat
ion. Twenty-six previously immunized patients had antibody titers less
than or equal to 0.2 IU against D and/or T or another abnormal vaccin
e response. All of these patients received boosters of diphtheria and
tetanus vaccine (D2T5). Diphtheria and tetanus antibody levels were as
sayed 4 weeks following booster vaccination. Results: Of the twenty-si
x subjects, a subset of patients (6) failed to show significant elevat
ions in specific-serum antibody titers to diphtheria and/or tetanus an
d were thus labeled nonresponders. These patients were retrospectively
compared with their responder counterparts examining specific antibod
y titers pre-immunization and post-immunization, serum immunoglobulins
, and clinical presentation. The groups showed no significant differen
ce in baseline specific antibody measures but following re-immunizatio
n responders showed a 31.34-fold and 22.33-fold increase in D and T an
tibody levels, respectively. In contrast, nonresponders produced only
a 2.62-fold to D and 6.15-fold increase to T (all group comparisons P
< .05). Clinical presentation also tended to be more severe in the non
responder group. Conclusions: These data stress the importance of spec
ific antibody titers preimmunization and post-immunization in the asse
ssment of immunodeficiency states, and emphasize the different charact
eristics of responses between diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. The abil
ity to achieve the minimum protective antibody level does not necessar
ily denote immune competence. Serum immunoglobulin levels and baseline
antibody titers are insufficient for the functional assessment of the
immune response, The ability to generate antibody responses following
booster vaccination is a more complete measure of overall immune comp
etence and should be considered when evaluating patients for replaceme
nt immunoglobulin therapy.