Different methods were tested in order to classify vegetation in large
releve-based data sets. These methods were applied to 3907 releves of
oatgrass meadows (Arrhenatherion) and Gentian-hairgrass swards (Mesob
romion) in central Germany Four methods were used: minimum variance cl
ustering (ORLOCI 1967), number of character species in the Braun-Blanq
uet system, Twinspan (HILL 1979), and the species group method develop
ed in Gottingen (BRUELHEIDE 1995). Although some details differed, all
four methods yielded satisfactory assignment results for both allianc
es. Differential species which make up the assignment criteria for the
resulting vegetation units are obtained by the last two methods only.
The species group method uses more species as differential criteria t
han Twinspan, and therefore assigns only well-characterized stands to
a vegetation unit. The species selected by Twinspan result in a higher
degree of assignment but have the disadvantage that more releves are
misclassified. As a result, the species group method is especially sui
ted for processing large databases and for extracting unambiguous assi
gnment criteria for various uses like mapping vegetation in the field.