Dj. Isaacman et al., A SIMPLE INTERVENTION FOR IMPROVING TELEPHONE CONTACT OF PATIENTS DISCHARGED FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, Pediatric emergency care, 13(4), 1997, pp. 256-258
Objective: To determine if emergency department (ED) follow-up contact
rates can be improved by confirming a best contact telephone number w
ith the patient prior to discharge, Design/Setting: Prospective compar
ison of intervention and control groups taken from convenience samples
of ED patients from Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (CHP) and Child
ren's Hospital of Wisconsin (CHW), Participants: One hundred eighty-ei
ght (188) patients (138 from CHP and 50 from CHW) who had x-rays and l
aboratory studies done in the ED were interviewed by the investigators
prior to discharge (intervention group) and 305 control patients (256
from CHP, 49 from CHW) identified from ED log books. Intervention: Pr
ior to discharging the patient from the ED, the investigators verified
and/or corrected the best contact number for a follow-up phone call w
ith each intervention patient, Within 24 hours of each visit, a follow
-up call was made to each intervention and control patient during one
of three time intervals spaced between 8 AM and 10 PM, Results: A tota
l of 29 patients, or 15.4%, of the intervention group, gave a telephon
e number that differed from the one listed in the patient's medical re
cord. Of the CHP group, 93.5% (129/138) of intervention patients and 7
8.5% (201/256) of control patients were successfully contacted (P < 0.
001), Of the CHW group, 96% (48/50) of intervention patients, and 94%
(46/49) of control patients were successfully contacted (P = NS), Succ
essful contact of control patients was greater in CHW than CHP (46/49
vs 201/256, P = 0.02), Conclusions: A significant proportion of teleph
one numbers listed in the ED medical records are incorrect, but the fr
equency of inaccuracy may be institution-dependent. Confirming the pat
ient's ''best contact'' number can significantly increase the successf
ul contact of ED patients.