Wdn. Kee et al., PATIENT-CONTROLLED EPIDURAL ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION USING A DISPOSABLE DEVICE, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(3), 1997, pp. 304-307
We have evaluated the use of a disposable device, the Patient Controll
ed Epidural Infusor, for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA)
using pethidine, for pain relief in the first 24 hours after elective
Caesarean section. Patients using the Patient Controlled Epidural Infu
sor (n = 20) were compared with a control group (n = 20) who received
PCEA using a standard electronic device. Efficacy, as assessed by visu
al analogue scores. was comparable to that achieved in the control gro
up. Patient and nursing satisfaction was high and similar to that in t
he control group. There was a low incidence of side-effects with both
devices. Patients using the disposable device used less pethidine than
patients using the electronic device (median (interquartile range) 18
1 (100-275) mg versus 238 (213-375) mg; p = 0.035). Use of this dispos
able device is an acceptable alternative to more expensive and bulkier
electronic devices for PCEA after Caesarean section.