M. Keating et A. Midwinter, THE POLITICS OF CENTRAL-LOCAL GRANTS IN BRITAIN AND FRANCE, Environment and planning. C, Government & policy, 12(2), 1994, pp. 177-194
Redistribution of resources through central-local government grant sys
tems is justified as fiscal equalization, the subject of a substantial
literature, underpinned by normative assumptions and a rational-synop
tic model of the policy process. Goals are known and policy outcomes a
re measurable. In Britain and France, this approach is not helpful to
understanding. Theories of fiscal equalization are problematic and inc
onsistent. There is no agreed territorial welfare function against whi
ch outcomes can be assessed. A politically based interpretation sees g
rant allocation as part of intergovernmental politics, in which concep
tions of fiscal equalization are used largely for legitimation. Politi
cs guides decisionmaking and the main test of policy applied by govern
ments is political acceptability. The two cases of Britain and France
do show important differences in intergovernmental politics. In France
, change is incremental and negotiated. In Britain it is radical and u
nilateral, though outcomes often fall short of expectations as policy
is modified in implementation.